Past the four types — 12 profiles across 11 scales
Inside the broad labels of avoidant and anxious,
this sets out, across 11 scales, your own particular way of reacting in attachment.
Answers are calculated on this device; no name or contact details are entered.
two core axes (abandonment anxiety and avoidance of closeness), and the nine subscales of immersion in a relationship, devotion, the urge to control, vulnerable narcissism, grandiose narcissism, shutting feeling down, freezing, testing behaviour and over-accommodation nine subscales.
This is a self-check using this site's own categories; the scale figures are not medical values, nor percentiles against the general population. Choose the answer closest to how you have actually been lately, not to the self you would like to be.
It does not stop at a type name; it sets out the reaction and the next move.
ABOUT THIS TEST
This quiz does not put attachment style into four boxes; it measures it as a coordinate on two axes. The closer someone sits to a boundary, the less a label alone explains.
You can't settle when no message comes, you watch the gap between read receipts, you go looking for proof they dislike you. The higher the score, the more this shows.
You go quiet when someone steps closer, putting feelings into words is painful, you cannot hold up without time alone. The higher the score, the more this shows.
Dividing by these two axes follows the four-category model of Bartholomew & Horowitz (1991). Low on both is secure; high on anxiety alone is anxious; high on avoidance alone is avoidant; high on both is fearful-avoidant.
In a four-way quiz, someone at 55% anxiety and 52% avoidance and someone at 90% and 90% both come out as fearful-avoidant. What actually troubles them is nothing alike. This quiz gives the position on the coordinates, and how strong it is, so you can read which of the two reactions comes first.
The result shows a percentile on each axis, the profile you fall into, and the situations likely to come up in a relationship. Rather than taking the name alone, read it as a combination of figures.
Attachment style really does move with what you live through. A stretch with a steady partner weakens the anxious and avoidant reactions; the aftermath of something that hurt strengthens them. Read it as one photograph of where you are now. It is not a medical test — if it is interfering with your life, put a professional service first.
No. It is a self-check for understanding yourself. If severe distress or interference with your life continues, put a medical service or a mental-health professional first.
Yes. Answers shift with your recent relationships and how stressed you are, so use the result as a picture of your current pattern of reacting.
The two core axes draw on the thinking of adult-attachment research, but the twelve profiles are this site's own arrangement, combining several psychological tendencies.
Working through the 11 scales…
Finding your profile among the twelve
So far, the focus has been on what may be happening for the other person. What happens on your side of a relationship deserves its own reflection too.
What you are watching now Attachment Profile (48 questions, about 6 minutes). Quizzes differ in what they measure and how far in they go. The diagram below shows where you are now and which one fits next.
A typical attachment quiz sorts you into secure, anxious, avoidant or fearful-avoidant. In practice, two anxious people — one who immerses themselves in their partner, one who tries to control them — behave nothing alike. This detailed quiz measures nine subscales alongside the two axes of abandonment anxiety and avoidance of closeness, and sorts the result into twelve profiles. The less a four-type quiz has convinced you, the more these 48 questions tend to land.
Two people with the same overall type can have quite different subscale shapes. High abandonment anxiety made mostly of sensitivity to the other person's reactions calls for something different from the same score made mostly of low self-worth. The first responds to practice at checking less often; the second needs the work of building self-regard outside the relationship. Reading the highest subscale rather than the overall type is what this quiz is for.
Cutting the two axes — abandonment anxiety and avoidance of closeness — into high and low gives four types. This quiz adds nine subscales on top and sorts you into twelve profiles. Within the high-anxiety group alone, the one who immerses themselves in the other person, the one who tries to control them, and the one who steps out of the relationship while still anxious behave in completely different ways. The more that a four-type quiz has left you thinking "it's right, but something is off", the more this resolution helps.
Measuring each subscale independently takes several questions per scale. Cut the item count and the differences between scales flatten out, leaving you back at the coarseness of a four-type quiz. Forty-eight is the minimum that holds the precision, and it takes about eight minutes. Leaving partway through records nothing, and no sign-up is needed.
It suits anyone who came away from a four-type attachment quiz thinking "right, but something is off", anyone who has had different results on different sites, and anyone whose pattern in relationships is not fully explained. Two people who land in the same box on two axes turn out, at subscale level, to have quite different places to start.
The most usable thing here is not the overall type but the subscale that came out highest. For two people equally high in abandonment anxiety, what works differs depending on whether it is made of sensitivity to the other person's reactions or of low self-worth. The first is a matter of how often you check; the second is the work of building self-regard outside the relationship.
Attachment style looks as though it comes in four boxes, but what is actually measured is two independent continuous quantities: how strong the fear of abandonment is, and how strong the avoidance of closeness is. Low on both is called secure; high on anxiety alone, anxious; high on avoidance alone, avoidant; high on both, fearful-avoidant. Knowing that structure lets you read "both at once" correctly when you sit near a boundary. The two numbers themselves come closer to the truth than the label does.
The first thing to do is write down, concretely, the situations in which your alarm goes off. A slow reply, a cancelled plan, a partner who is tired — the triggers differ from person to person by a surprising margin. Then list what you do when it goes off. Usually, changing one of those actions is enough to change where the relationship goes. Putting a beat between the feeling and the action is more realistic than trying to erase the feeling, and it works faster.
🔗 When citing data or figures from this article, please credit "Attachment MBTI (mbti-svaf.com)" and link to the relevant page.
Meet the editorial teamQuiz methodology and editorial policy About the original content reviewer
The review information shown here applies to the Japanese original. It does not indicate that the reviewer has checked this translation.